The arrival of the updated Subaru Forester has brought with it the addition of a new powertrain option for the Japanese brand’s mid-size, off-road-focused crossover. For the first time, the Forester is available with Subaru’s 2.0-litre ‘Boxer’ turbodiesel in conjunction with its Lineartronic CVT automatic gearbox.
Up until this car’s launch, if you were after rugged off-road ability with the efficiency of a diesel and the convenience of an auto, you had to look elsewhere. But by adding this new engine and gearbox mix to the line-up, along with the brand’s trademark off-road ability, Subaru has put the Forester in the firing line of some strong competition.
• Best Crossovers and small SUVs on sale
Mazda’s all-wheel-drive automatic CX-5 in 2.2-litre turbodiesel Sport Nav form carries an identical price tag to the Subaru, at £30,995.
So in a head-to-head battle, which 4x4 offers the better mix of on-road manners, refinement, practicality and – for those occasions when you might need it – all-terrain ability?
We’ve put both machines through their paces on the tarmac and on the loose stuff to find out which is a more compelling all-round package. Read on for the full Auto Express verdict.
Head-to-head
Off-road modes
The Mazda doesn’t feel as solid off-road as its rival. Lineartronic versions of the Subaru feature X-Mode hill descent control that gives the car an edge away from the tarmac, while the brand’s symmetrical all-wheel-drive system provides good grip. The plastic body cladding adds extra protection, even though it doesn’t look especially stylish.
Quality
Subaru has improved all its cars’ interiors, but while this Forester features some higher-quality materials, it’s let down elsewhere by budget plastics. The Mazda has more of an expensive feel, with knurled infotainment and ventilation system controls adding sparkle to its classy cabin.
Safety
Crossovers like these make perfect family cars, so safety is a key factor. Mazda’s £800 optional Safety Pack adds rear cross traffic alert as well as rear Smart City Brake Support autonomous braking to go with the standard alert system.
Verdict
First place: Mazda CX-5
You get more power, equipment and style for your cash with the CX-5. It’ll be cheaper to run than the Subaru, too, plus it’s better to drive on the road, where these cars will spend most of their time. The Mazda can’t quite match the Forester’s off-road ability – although it’ll go further than you’d imagine – but it’s a more refined, attractive SUV that better teams performance and comfort with usability.
Second place: Subaru Forester
If you’re after a rugged, no-nonsense SUV with above-average off-road ability, the Forester deserves a closer look. It’s also comfortable, well equipped and practical, plus it’s powered by a refined diesel engine. Yet it’s hobbled by its high CO2 emissions and awkward styling, meaning it simply can’t compete against smarter, cleaner choices.
Other options in this category...
Honda CR-V 1.6 i-DTEC SE Navi Auto
Price: £31,010
Engine: 1.6-litre 4cyl, 158bhp
A nine-speed auto makes this diesel CR-V a practical cruiser thanks to a vast 589 litres of boot space. And although it’s only a 1.6-litre, there’s still a healthy 158bhp on tap. The Honda just isn’t as dynamic to drive as our test cars.
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 Titanium X AWD Auto
Price: £31,230
Engine: 2.0-litre 4cyl, 178bhp
If you’re after more performance and precise handling, the 178bhp Kuga with Ford’s PowerShift auto box and four-wheel drive should fit the bill. But with a 406-litre load bay, it’s not as practical as the Mazda or Subaru.
Figures
| Mazda CX-5 Sport Nav 2.2 SkyActiv-D 175 AWD Auto | Subaru Forester 2.0D XC Premium Lineartronic | |
| On the road price/total as tested | £30,995/£31,545 | £30,995/£31,495 |
| Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000) | £13,824/44.6% | £13,424/43.3% |
| Depreciation | £17,171 | £17,571 |
| Annual tax liability std/higher rate | £1,725/£3,449 | £1,908/£3,816 |
| Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles) | £1,366/£2,277 | £1,743/£2,904 |
| Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost | 21/£671/F/£145 | 25/£726/G/£180 |
| Servicing costs | £711 (3yrs) | £787 (3yrs) |
| Length/wheelbase | 4,555/2,700mm | 4,610/2,640mm |
| Height/width | 1,710/1,840mm | 1,735/1,795mm |
| Engine | 4cyl in-line/2,191cc | Flat-four/1,998cc |
| Peak power/revs | 173/4,500 bhp/rpm | 145/3,600 bhp/rpm |
| Peak torque/revs | 420/2,000 Nm/rpm | 350/1,600 Nm/rpm |
| Transmission | 6-spd auto/4wd | CVT auto/4wd |
| Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel | 58 litres/repair kit | 60 litres/full-size |
| Boot capacity (seats up/down) | 503/1,620 litres | 505/1,592 litres |
| Kerbweight/payload/towing weight | 1,628/497/2,000kg | 1,645/458/2,000kg |
| Turning circle/drag coefficient | 11.7 metres/N/A | 10.6 metres/N/A |
| Basic warranty (miles)/recovery | 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs | 5yrs (100,000)/3yrs |
| Service intervals/UK dealers | 12,500 miles (1yr)/170 | 12,000 miles (1yr)/59 |
| Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. | 9th/15th* | 10th/6th* |
| NCAP: Adult/child/ped./assist/stars | 94/87/64/86/5 (2012) | 91/91/73/86/5 (2012) |
| 0-60/30-70mph | 8.1/8.1 secs | 9.9/10.6 secs |
| 30-50mph in 3rd/4th | 3.3/4.5 secs | 3.9/4.4 secs |
| 50-70mph in 5th/6th/7th | 6.9/9.0 secs/N/A | 6.7/8.9/10.8 secs |
| Top speed/rpm at 70mph | 127mph/2,000rpm | 117mph/2,000rpm |
| Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph | 56.8/34.6/9.6 metres | 58.7/37.8/11.4 metres |
| Noise outside/idle/30/70mph | 75/52/63/69dB | 73/52/62/70dB |
| Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range | 44.0/9.7/561 miles | 34.5/7.6/455 miles |
| Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 44.1/57.6/51.4mpg | 38.7/52.3/46.3mpg |
| Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 9.7/12.7/11.3mpl | 8.5/11.5/10.2mpl |
| Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket | 172/144g/km/28% | 219/158g/km/31% |
| Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/camera | Six/yes/yes/yes | Seven/yes/£435/yes |
| Auto box/stability/cruise ctrl/AEB^ | Yes/yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes/no |
| Climate control/leather/heated seats | Yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes |
| Metallic paint/xenon lights/keyless go | £550/LED/yes | £500/yes/yes |
| Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth | Yes/yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes/yes |